Future Journalism, Yes or No?


As we have seen the news that posted at Internet, blogs and other social media source, are they have become valuable content for us to read? I would say yes.  It is because I believe these who known as the citizen journalists, engaging on the practices of journalism must have their own principle behind on writing the news or stories. No doubt, the media is converging and turning into a powerful communication form to the public. For example, people used to read newspaper at home but now, majority of the people have smart phone and tend to read E-news. ‘It is a mode of communication that allows them to ‘to talk to each other’ about what is happening in their surroundings.’ (Kabilan 2009) Hence, reading the news from citizen journalist is something more fresh and interesting because they can comment and reply to each other opinions.

Sometimes, people might think citizen journalist are just bombarding on certain issue. However, I personally think that they are not bombarding but it is just the way they write could be different compare to the professional journalist. They are just telling their opinion and thinking in a direct manner. Notwithstanding, they are the citizen journalism; they need to be ready to accept ‘audience insight is also the foundation of an important cultural shift across platforms.’ (Miller & Hayward 2009) Who knows one day the people who just read about newspaper will find out that news from online media are way more interesting and convincing? It is not just reading a sheet of fact, but it is about the discussion among the world.

“Most journalists, even the generally critical ones, had positive things to say about the inclusion of users as a new source”. (Quandt 2011) This means even some of the professional journalists accepts the involvement of online media. It might have become a platform for them to refer in natural manner. What’s more, I think increasing of citizen journalism will be in continuous situation because blogging, Facebook, Twitter and others have become very common to the society nowadays. Therefore, I think there might be cooperation between professional and citizen journalism in the future. It is not just about the online media and print media, but it is the journalism attitude. 


Kabilan K 2009, ‘New media, citizen’s journalism and democracy: the Malaysiakini project’, Media Asia, vol. 36, no. 3, viewed 18 April 2013, UOW database

Miller, C & Hayward, D 2009, ‘The Future of Journalism’, Papers from a conference organised by the BBC College of Journalism, viewed 17 April 2013


Quandt, T 2011, ‘Understanding a new phenomenon: the significance of participatory journalism’, in JB singer, A Hermida, D Domingo, A Heinonen, S Paulussen, T Quandt, Z Reich & M Vujnovic (eds.), Participatory Journalism in Online Newspapers: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Wiley- Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, pp 155-176.


Pinkwashing to brainwash anyone of you~


What is actually “pinkwashing” mean to you? Literally, the practice of “pinkwashing” is referring to the companies and non-profit groups as the leaders to confront breast cancer and in a meantime it might be also having the possibility of bringing up the breast cancer’s rates. As a matter of fact, this practice has actually adopting pink color and pink ribbon on different products to increase their sales and profit while engaging to support breast cancer research.  For example, KFC, Avon, Estee Lauder, Campbell’s soup, M&M and etcetera which are from diverse companies have become “Susan G Komen for the cure”. Do these products which have adopted with pink could become the cure for them? Apparently, I am strongly disagree because “pinkwashing” seems to be an unethical practice due to it is just gaining their companies’ sales profit and the diseases seems like did not change for the better. Hence, it is somehow misleading the public with these products because some of the products like cosmetic has carried potential harmful chemical which will lead to increasing rate of breast cancer.  What’s more, I am totally agree on Professor Darin Wike who has stated that “the likelihood that a woman will be diagnosed with breast cancer in her lifetime increases every year; pinkwashing does not really do anything to reduce that likelihood, but it does certainly increase the bottom line of the companies that are participating in the practice of it.” (Wike 2012) It is true that various companies have take advantage in it to maximize the sales of the products but there is a doubt on why those companies will choose not to undertake or assurance on eradicating the dangerous and harmful chemical from the products? Somehow, this practice could have just destroyed the reputation of what a company should do due to the misused of pink ribbon on products eventually. 



Does this make sense? Smoke in PINK. Cure for the breast cancer? Ridiculous.



Lubitow, A & Davis, M 2011, “Pastel Injustice: the corporate use of pinkwashing for profit”, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 139-144.

Wike, D 2012, “Pinkwashing: Cashing in on Breast Cancer”, pp.10, viewed 10 April 2013 http://systemdcreative.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/imc-363-commentary-paper-pinkwashing.pdf

Self Regulation in Malaysia?


Does media regulation need to be always keeping pace with the media development? In my opinion, I think it is needed to depend on what kind of issues. For example, racial and religious are the controversial issues that Malaysia media has agreed to stay away in order not to create hatred and chaos among the public. However, there is “media ethics and self-regulation are complicated by the different performance standards that mass media operations establish for themselves.” (Ramanathan, Ivan & Kaur n.d.) The self-regulation is actually abided to the “Communications and Multimedia Content Code (Content Code) which is a set of industry guidelines for the usage and/or dissemination of content via the electronic networked medium for public consumption.” (The Communication & Multimedia Content Forum of Malaysia 2011) As a matter of fact, Malaysia government has been seriously focused on laws and regulations to the extent of content restriction and limit of creativity on media field. The content codes which have been set up are infused the boundaries of print media, radio, internet and others media that actually making too much guidelines for them to follow.

For example, there was a case that a journalist from Malaysia’s National Union insists “that newspapers be allowed to regulate themselves through an independent media council that will ensure ethical journalism.” (Boo, 2011) Personally I think the government should have give some space for the journalist to regulate themselves especially on what kind of issues needed to be interfere or not to be interfere. Hence, this could be a win-win situation for the journalist and government to decrease disputation and also beneficial for them to know how to disseminate the news to the public in a right time with right words. To conclude, I think certain issues have to be controlled by certain regulation could minimize the risk of society in chaos situation. Hence, media regulation or self-regulation has its advantage and disadvantage upon specific issues. 


Alsagoff, SA, Abdullah, Z & Hassan, MS 2011, ‘The growth and development of the Malaysian media landscape in shaping media regulation’, Global Media Journal – Malaysian Edition, vol.1, no.1, pp32-55.

BOO, SL 2011, ‘Journalist union insists on self-regulation’,The Malaysian Insider, 16 May, viewed 3 April 2013, http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/journalist-union-insists-on-self-regulation

Ramanathan, S, Ivan, LSC & Kaur, K n.d., ‘Media Regulation, Re-regulation and Self Regulation in Malaysia and Singapore: A Comparative Analysis of Current Status, Needs and Trends’, viewed 3 April 2013, http://www.amic.org.sg/Resources/Research_Materials/media_democracy_and_government/Media%20Regulation%20Reregulation%20and%20SelfRegulation.pdf

The Communication & Multimedia Content Forum of Malaysia 2011, viewed 3 April 2013, http://cmcf.net/